CONTRACEPTION AS A FACTOR FOR PRESERVING WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH DURING WAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/3083-7324/2025.1.3Keywords:
contraception, counselling, reproductive health, young people, sex education, prevention of sexually transmitted infections.Abstract
During the war, women's reproductive health (RH) becomes one of the most vulnerable links: the “rejuvenation” of many precancerous and tumorous gynaecological diseases, an increase in the number of women with premature ovarian failure, an increase in the risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and fertility control occurs by terminating an unwanted pregnancy. The purpose of the research is to examine the level of awareness among young women about modern hormonal contraceptives (HC) and the prevalence of their use during wartime. Materials and methods. In order to achieve this purpose, between November 12, 2023, and March 20, 2024, according to the author's questionnaire, which contained 25 questions in Ukrainian and Hebrew and was posted on the website of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the SI “Lugansk State Medical University” and on the Instagram social network, a voluntary online survey of 311 women aged 14 to 35 years, who are legally considered young. The surveyed women were divided into two groups by citizenship and country of residence: I was formed by 190 citizens of Ukraine, II – 121 citizens of Israel. The results. Female respondents aged 18 to 27 showed the greatest interest in the survey. Among the young women, female students of higher education dominated. A third of the female respondents stated their sexual debut in adolescence. Also, a third of the respondents had unprotected first sexual intercourse. Every fourth Ukrainian woman and every fifth Israeli woman at the time of their first sexual intercourse had no idea about the available means of unplanned pregnancy and STD prevention. The results of the survey prove that there are real difficulties today in the acquisition of sexual knowledge by young people: the vast majority of young women cite only social networks as their main source of information; only one in two respondents considers herself to be fully aware of modern contraceptive methods – which is unreasonable; the low role of gynaecologists, family doctors and the family in the sexual education of young people. Based on the obtained results, the male condom is the most popular means of unwanted pregnancy prevention among Ukrainian women (41.9%), oral contraceptives are used by only 17.4% of surveyed women І Group, some prefer spermicides (9.9%) and interrupted sexual intercourse (15.1%), regarding the surveyed women ІІ Group, after the analysis we have: 10.7%, 67.8%, 1.7%, 9.9%, respectively; 24.2% of surveyed women І group and 8.3% of surveyed women ІІ group still experience difficulties in obtaining information about the influence of hormonal contraceptives (HC) on the general state of RH; the low level of oral contraception application is attributed by the vast majority of female respondents from the І group to a lack of knowledge about its real possibilities and possible risks, the lack of confidence of gynaecologists during appointments and the negative attitude of doctors of related specialities. Conclusions. It is necessary to change the paradigm of fertility regulation towards safe and effective prevention of unplanned pregnancies in order to create conditions for maintaining the reproductive health of the population in war conditions. The introduction of sex education into the programme of high schools and the strengthening of the role of gynaecologists and family doctors in the educational work with teenagers will make it possible to increase the awareness of young people about the real benefits of contraception.
References
1. Лендєл I. Репродуктивне здоров’я жінки: ризики під час війни. 2022. URL: https://www.healthright.org.ua/statti/reproduktivne-zdorovya-zhinki-riziki-pid-chas-vijni/.
2. Горбатюк О., Григоренко А., Шатковська А., Васьків О., Герич О., Петраш А. Особливості гормонального гомеостазу жінок з функціональною гіпоталамічною аменореєю та передчасною недостатністю яєчників, спричинених посттравматичним стресовим розладом. Репродуктивне здоров’я жінки. 2023. Вип. 3. С. 65–72. https://doi.org/10.30841/ 2708-8731.3.2023.283324.
3. Константінова Н. Війна і жінки: трагічні наслідки для репродуктивного здоров’я. 2021. URL: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/viyna-i-zhinky-trahichni-naslidky- dla-reproduktyvnoho-zdorovia/31508583.html.
4. Дослідницька служба Верховної Ради України. Концепція законодавчого забезпечення репродуктивного здоров’я. 2023. URL: https://research.rada.gov.ua/uploads/documents/ 32789.pdf.
5. Про основні засади молодіжної політики : Закон України від 27.04.2021 № 1414-IX. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1414-20#n356.
6. World Health Organization. Population, Israel. 2022. URL: https://data.who.int/countries/376.
7. Летяк В. Відкладення шлюбу та народження дітей: як змінились українці за 30 років. 2021. URL: https://fakty.com.ua/ua/ukraine/suspilstvo/20210820-vidkladennya-shlyubu-ta- narodzhennya-ditej-yak-zminylys-ukrayintsi-za-30-rokiv/.
8. Фернандес Мішель. До якого віку жінки можуть відкласти народження дитини? BBC News Ukraine. 2020. URL: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/vert-fut-54210728.
9. Вовк K. Сексуальна освіта в Україні. Чому це важливо та на що впливає? Analytical portal Aware. 2023. URL: https://svidomi.in.ua/page/seksualna-osvita-v-ukraini-chomu- tse-vazhlyvo-ta-na-shcho-vplyvaie.
10. World Health Organization. Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). 2023. URL: https://www.who.int/ru/health-topics/sexually-transmitted-infections#tab=tab_1.
11. Жилка Н. Я., Щербінська О. С. Сучасні пробіотики у лікуванні інфекцій, що передають- ся статевим шляхом. Від проблеми до її вирішення. Репродуктивне здоров’я жінки. 2023. Вип. 6 (69). С. 15–22. URL: https://repro-health.com.ua/article/view/289992/283904.
12. Zhabchenko I. A. Habitual miscarriage: what you should do and what you should not do (Review). Health of Woman. 2018. No. 1. Р. 9–13. https://doi.org/10.15574/HW.2018.127.9.
13. Камінський А., Харун, І. Обґрунтування взаємозв’язку та «ефекту замкненого циклу» між посттравматичним стресовим розладом та звичним невиношуванням вагітності. Репродуктивне здоров’я жінки. 2023. Вип. 3. С. 18–23. https://doi.org/10.30841/2708-8731. 3.2023.283319.
14. Романенко Т., Морозова О. Сучасний погляд на переривання небажаної вагіт- ності нехірургічним методом. Репродуктивне здоров’я жінки. 2022. Вип. 1. С. 8–12. https://doi.org/10.30841/2708-8731.1.2022.258129.
15. Glover A. V., Manuck T. A. Screening for spontaneous preterm birth and resultant therapies to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: A review. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018. Vol. 23 (2). Р. 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.007.
16. Kunpalin Y., Burul G., Greenwold N., Tetteh A., Casagrandi D., Warner D., Fox G., Greig E., James C. P., David A. L. Factors associated with preterm birth in women undergoing cervical cerclage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020. No. 251. Р. 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejogrb.2020.05.027.
17. Access to Postabortion Contraception: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 833. Obstet Gynecol. 2021. Vol. 138 (2). Р. 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004475.
18. Ковальова A. Сексуальна освіта: що це таке та чому вона потрібна дітям та батькам. 2024. URL: https://dostyp.com.ua/novini/seksualna-osvita-sho-ce-take-ta-chomu-vona-korisna- dityam-i-batkam2024/.
19. Про деякі питання державних стандартів загальної середньої освіти зі змінами, внесени- ми відповідно до постанови Кабінету Міністрів № 972 від 30 серпня 2022 року : постано- ва Кабінету Міністрів України від 30 вересня 2020 року № 898. URL: https://imzo.gov.ua/ osvita/zagalno-serednya-osvita-2/typova-osvitnia-prohrama-dlia-5-9-klasiv-zakladiv-zahal-noi- seredn-oi-osvity/ https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/898-2020-%D0%BF#Text.
20. Beaumont K, Maquire M. Policies for Sexuality Education in the European Union. Brussels, European Union. 2013. 52 р. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/ join/2013/462515/IPOL-FEMM_NT(2013)462515_EN.pdf.
21. Mahanova T. V. Research on the degree of awareness of consumers regarding the selection of contraceptives in the process of family planning. Management, economics and quality assurance in pharmacy. 2021. Vol. 1 (65). Р. 1–7. http://dspace.zsmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/14771.
22. 12 запитань про контрацепцію, відповіді на які варто знати кожному. Подкаст «Прав- да про жіноче здоров’я». 2018. URL: https://hromadske.radio/podcasts/womanhealth/riven- vykorystannya-gormonalnyh-kontraceptyviv-v-ukrayini-blyzkyy-do-pokaznyka-krayin-afryky- ginekologynya.
23. Hognert H., Skjeldestad F. E., Gemzell-Danielsson K., Heikinheimo O., Milsom I., Lidegaard, Lindh I. Ecological study on the use of hormonal contraception, abortions and births among teenagers in the Nordic countries. BMJ Open. 2018. Vol. 8 (10). https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2018-022473
24. Hopkins J. WHO. Family Planning: a Global Handbook for Providers (Updated 4th Edition 2022). 2022 Nov 16 [cited 2022 Nov 15]. URL: https://reliefweb.int/report/ world/family-planning-global-handbook-providers-updated-4th-edition-2022?gad_ source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjw-5y1BhC-ARIsAAM_oKlvG5o7AuJgrJwB1q3Gd3lRUDNUcN0 Ud-CpfBYYdZYMXlKfBM3H6ZsaAibQEALw_wcB.
25. Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. Clinical Guideline: Combined Hormonal Contraception. 2019. URL: https://www.fsrh.org/standards-and-guidance/documents/ combined-hormonal-contraception/.
26. Terefe A., Larson C. P. Modern Contraception Use in Ethiopia: Does Involving Husbands Make a Difference? American Journal of Public Health. 1993. No. 83. Р. 1567–1571.
27. Fait T., Buryak D., Cirstoiu M. M., Luczai E., Janczura R. Needs and preferences of women users of oral contraceptives in selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Drugs Context. 2018. No. 7. 212510. https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.212510.
28. Merki-Feld G. S., Caetano C., Porz T. C., Bitzer J. Are there unmet needs in contraceptive counselling and choice? Findings of the European TANCO Study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018. Vol. 23 (3). Р. 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2018.1465546.
29. Nappi R. E., Vermuyten N., Bannemerschult R. Missed opportunities in contraceptive counselling: findings from a European survey-based study with simulated patient consultation. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022. Vol. 27 (2). Р. 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13625187.2021.2010040.
30. Barnett C., Hagemann Chr., Dinger J., Minh Th. Do, Heinemann K. Fertility and combined oral contraceptives – unintended pregnancies and planned pregnancies following oral contraceptive use – results from the INAS-SCORE study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017. Vol. 22 (1). Р. 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1241991.
31. Archer D. F., Merkatz R. B., Bahamondes L., Westhoff C. L., Darney P., Apter D., Jensen J. T., Brache V., Nelson A. L., Banks E., Bбrtfai G., Portman D. J., Plagianos M., Dart C., Kumar N., Creasy G. W., Sitruk-Ware R., Blithe D. L. Efficacy of the 1-year (13-cycle) segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system: results of two multicentre, open-label, single- arm, phase 3 trials. Lancet Glob Health. 2019. Vol. 7 (8). e1054–e1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S2214-109X(19)30265-7.
32. Simpson J. The new FSRH guideline on Combined Hormonal Contraception: how does it change practice? BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2019. Vol. 45 (2). Р. 85. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjsrh-2018-200295.
33. FSRH Guideline. Progestogen-only Pills. [Internet]. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh- 2022-PoP.
34. Munro M. G., Critchley H. O. D., Fraser I. S. FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee. The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018. Vol. 143 (3). Р. 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12666.
35. da Silva Filho A. L., Caetano C., Lahav A., Grandi G., Lamaita R. M. The difficult journey to treatment for women suffering from heavy menstrual bleeding: a multi-national survey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021. Vol. 26 (5). Р. 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13625187.2021.1925881.
36. Teede H. J., Misso M. L., Costello M. F., Dokras A., Laven J., Moran L., Piltonen T., Norman R. J. International PCOS Network. Recommendations from the international evidence- based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2018. Vol. 33 (9). Р. 1602–1618. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey256.
37. Жилка Н. Я., Щербінська О. С., Гойда Н. Г., Голубчиков М. В. Вплив вітчизня- них стратегій щодо збереження репродуктивного здоров’я на поліпшення демогра- фічної ситуації в Україні. Репродуктивне здоров’я жінки. 2024. Вип. 4 (75). С. 8–15. https://doi.org/10.30841/2708-8731.4.2024.308990.
38. Thiery M. Intrauterine contraception: from silver ring to intrauterine contraceptive implant. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000. Vol. 90 (2). Р. 145–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/ s0301-2115(00)00262-1.
39. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Best practice in postpartum family planning. Best Practice Paper No. [Internet]. 2015 June 1. URL: https://www.glowm.com/pdf/ best-practice-paper-1---postpartum-family-planning.pdf.
40. Bibi S., Shoukat A., Maroof P., Mushraf S. Postpartum contraception utilization and its impact on inter pregnancy interval among mothers accessing maternity services in the public sector hospital of Hyderabad Sindh. Pak J Med Sci. 2019. Vol. 35 (6). Р. 1482–1487. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.6.914.
41. Meaidi A., Kuhr Skals R., Alexander Gerds T., Lidegaard O., Torp-Pedersen C. Decline in Danish use of oral tranexamic acid with increasing use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: a nationwide drug utilization study. Contraception. 2020. Vol. 101 (5). Р. 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.12.013.
42. Bianchi P., Guo S. W., Habiba M., Benagiano G. Utility of the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in the Treatment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and Dysmenorrhea: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med. 2022. Vol. 11 (19). Р. 5836. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195836.
43. Merki-Feld G. S., Caetano C., Porz T. C., Bitzer J. Are there unmet needs in contraceptive counselling and choice? Findings of the European TANCO Study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018. Vol. 23 (3). Р. 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2018.1465546.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Н. Г. Корнієць, С. В. Тертична-Телюк, О. С. Гришина, С. В. Кулик, Є. В. Краснопольська, Р. М. Прядко (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

