DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF TRUE CARDIOMEGALY AND PERICARDIAL EFFUSION: THE VALUE OF THE CARDIOTHORACIC INDEX ON A CHEST RADIOGRAPH

Authors

  • I. V. Frolova State Establishment "Lugansk State Medical University" Author
  • O. Yu. Chumak Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine; State Establishment "Lugansk State Medical University" Author
  • A. O. Chumak Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/3083-7324/2025.2.5

Keywords:

cardiothoracic index, differential diagnosis, cardiomegaly, pericardial effusion, chest radiography, cardiac tamponade, echocardiography.

Abstract

The article discusses the role of cardiothoracic index (CTI) in the differential diagnosis of true cardiomegaly and cardiac shadow enlargement caused by pericardial effusion. Despite the development of modern imaging methods, chest radiography remains the most accessible method of primary diagnosis, and CTI is a key screening indicator. Radiological differenti- ation criteria are analyzed: true cardiomegaly is characterized by a gradual increase in CTI and the presence of pulmonary venous congestion, while pericardial effusion is characterized by a rapid increase in CTI, the formation of a “bulb-shaped” cardiac shadow, and the absence of congestion. Special attention is paid to the rate of change of CTI as a critical diag- nostic indicator reflecting the pathophysiology of fluid accumulation in the pericardium. It is emphasized that a normal CTI does not exclude acute cardiac tamponade, and the diagnosis requires confirmation by echocardiography.

References

1. Gac, P., Poręba, M., & Gać, M. (2021). Radiological cardiothoracic ratio in evidence-based medicine. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021. Vol. 10 (9). 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092016.

2. Mettler F. A. Essentials of radiology (3rd ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. 2014.

3. Oh J. K., Steward J. B., & Tajik A. J. The echo manual (3rd ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health. 2012.

4. American Society of Echocardiography. Clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease. 2013. https://www.asecho.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2013_Multimodality-CV-Imaging-for-Pericardial-Disease.pdf.

5. European Society of Cardiology. Cardiac tamponade: A clinical challenge. E-Journal of Cardiology Practice, 15. Retrieved from https://www.escardio.org/Journals/E-Journal-of-Cardiology-Practice/Volume-15/Cardiac-tamponade-a-clinical-challenge.

6. Radiopaedia. Pericardial effusion. Retrieved from https://radiopaedia.org/articles/pericardial-effusion-1.

7. Kumar A., Chhabra A., & Ruparel R. Massive pericardial effusion in a case of acute pericarditis with slight ST-segment elevation of short duration. Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research. 2012. Vol. 3 (2). Р. 167–169. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-3583.95380.

8. Okada M., Inoue K., Onishi T., Tanaka N., Iwakura K., Seo M., ... & OCVC-Heart Failure Investigators. Cardiothoracic ratio as a prognostic marker in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Journal of Cardiology. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.09.008.

9. Коваль О. І., Децик О. З., Брода Р. М. Порівняльна оцінка кардіоторакального індексу за даними рентгенографії та мультиспіральної комп’ютерної томографії у хворих на кардіальну патологію. Український кардіологічний журнал. 2018. № 5. С. 45–50.

10. Felipe Soares Torres, Diego A. Eifer MSc, Felipe Sanchez Tijmes, Elsie T. Nguyen, Kate Hanneman. Diagnostic performance of chest radiography measurements for the assessment of cardiac chamber enlargement. CMAJ. 2021. Vol. 193. Р. E1683–1692. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.210083.

Published

2025-12-25